IMRAN KHAN, THE FORMER prime minister who now serves as the chairman of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf, has never been one to shy away from bombastic statements. His bold and assertive nature is something that commands attention and perhaps earns him admiration from certain quarters. In a recent video address to his supporters, which he aptly dubs his “national addresses,” Khan revealed an intriguing new pastime – delving into the world of law, claiming to have accumulated vast experience through his “immeasurable” court visits.
Also read: 27 years destroyed in just 27 hours
Surprisingly, Khan has even expressed his intention to represent himself in legal matters at some point in the future. This audacious declaration undoubtedly caught many off guard, considering that he rose to fame as the captain of the Pakistan cricket team before venturing into the unpredictable realm of politics. Khan’s cavalier approach to due process and a propensity to overlook existing legislation might raise a few eyebrows among those who take the law seriously. It is almost as if Khan’s interest in law is more of an entertaining diversion than a genuine passion. Unfortunately for Imran Khan, however, his dreams of pursuing law are overshadowed by the fact that he has never much cared for it. For a man that has no regard for due process, or any overarching legislation, for that matter, it is almost insulting to watch Khan state such on a national medium.
Also read: Mending Pakistan’s ties with Russia
As Imran Khan continues to navigate the political landscape with his audacious persona, it becomes evident that his influence seems to reign supreme. While his interest in law may raise eyebrows, his disregard for the abstract idea of lawmaking as it stands challenges the very foundations of justice. In Imran Khan’s world, where he bends the rules so much so that one finds themselves both captivated and concerned, we witness a paradigm where the boundaries of power and authority are constantly pushed. To add insult to injury, Khan’s ill-morals with regards to the democratic process cast a shadow over his influence and raise doubts about his commitment to upholding the ideals of the “fair and just society” he seems to clamour onto wanting to establish. ∎
