IOJK (The Thursday Times) — Official figures emerging from Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir paint a stark picture of an economy under strain, where unemployment among educated youth has reached crisis levels and recruitment across government institutions appears deliberately stalled. The data sharply contradicts New Delhi’s repeated claims of post-2019 “development” and economic normalisation in the territory.
According to official records, more than 357,000 educated young people in Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir are currently unemployed, placing the region among the highest unemployment zones under India. The scale of joblessness is particularly alarming given the territory’s heavy dependence on the public sector, with limited private or industrial capacity to absorb graduates.
What stands out most is the scale of unfilled posts. Despite thousands of positions being formally sanctioned, recruitment has effectively frozen across departments. Direct recruitment vacancies alone include 3,808 gazetted posts, 22,501 non-gazetted posts, and 12,751 multi-tasking staff roles. An additional backlog persists under promotion quotas, where 6,409 gazetted, 24,451 non-gazetted, and 5,473 MTS positions remain vacant. Public sector undertakings show a similar pattern, with hundreds of gazetted and thousands of non-gazetted posts lying unfilled.
This is not merely bureaucratic delay. The consistency and scale of the vacancies suggest a structural hiring freeze rather than administrative inefficiency. For a region whose economy relies overwhelmingly on government employment, the refusal to fill sanctioned posts has created a bottleneck that disproportionately affects educated youth, leaving degrees without pathways and fuelling long-term economic frustration.
Instead of addressing this widening employment gap, local governance remains dominated by security priorities. Resources and administrative attention are heavily directed towards surveillance, search operations, and raids, while economic policymaking and job creation remain marginal concerns. The absence of credible employment strategies has intensified the sense of exclusion among young people who were promised stability and opportunity following constitutional changes.
The result is an economy trapped in stagnation. Without private sector expansion, industrial investment, or meaningful public hiring, unemployment in IOJK is becoming structural rather than cyclical. Educated youth are not simply waiting for jobs; they are being systematically sidelined.
For New Delhi, these figures undermine the claim that governance reforms have translated into economic empowerment. Development cannot be measured through infrastructure announcements alone while hundreds of thousands remain jobless and sanctioned posts go unfilled. In IIOJK, unemployment has become not just an economic indicator, but a political signal, one that challenges the credibility of India’s narrative of progress in the territory.
