TLDR:
Australia bans social media for under-16s.
Historic laws passed with bipartisan support.
Platforms face strict penalties for non-compliance.
CANBERRA (The Thursday Times) — Australia has made history by becoming the first country to ban social media access for children under the age of 16. The legislation, passed with overwhelming bipartisan support, represents a major step in safeguarding the mental well-being and online safety of young Australians.
The legislation and its implications
The new law prohibits platforms such as TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, and Snapchat from allowing children under 16 to access their services. This landmark decision follows concerns about the mental health impact of social media, with the government citing cases of bullying and extortion leading to severe consequences for young users. The legislation also imposes substantial penalties on companies failing to take adequate measures to enforce the age restriction.
While children attempting to bypass the ban will not face penalties, social media giants can be fined heavily if they fail to comply. Companies like Meta have expressed reservations about the rushed passage of the law, highlighting the lack of comprehensive consultation and evidence.
Government priorities and bipartisan backing
The Albanese government positioned the legislation as a measure to protect children from the harmful effects of social media, emphasising its commitment to putting the well-being of Australian families above corporate profits. The opposition, led by Peter Dutton, backed the bill, marking a rare moment of political unity. Both parties underscored the urgent need for platforms to prioritise the safety of young users.
The legislation was inspired in part by News Corp’s “Let Them Be Kids” campaign, which gained widespread public support earlier this year. It reflects a growing global discourse on holding tech companies accountable for the societal impacts of their platforms.
Social media giants’ response
The tech industry has voiced concerns over the feasibility of implementing the age-verification measures required by the legislation. Companies like Meta argue that the rushed timeline has left little room for consultation or assessing the practicalities of enforcement. An ongoing $6.5 million age-verification trial was intended to explore these issues but has yet to conclude.
Despite their concerns, platforms acknowledge the growing regulatory pressures and the need to address the safety challenges posed by underage users. The new laws signal a broader shift toward stricter oversight of tech companies.
Broader context of global regulation
Australia’s decision to impose this ban sets a precedent for other countries grappling with the societal impact of social media. While many governments have introduced regulatory measures targeting platform accountability, few have adopted such sweeping restrictions.
The legislation is part of a broader trend in which nations are exploring ways to curb the adverse effects of online platforms on vulnerable populations. By placing child safety at the forefront, Australia aims to lead the charge in redefining the relationship between governments, tech companies, and users.
