NEW DELHI (The Thursday Times) — Bharat ke mehkama-e-telecommunication ne do jaali High Court ahkamat ki bunyad par internet faraham kunandagan ko 129 websites block karne ki hidayat di, aur Uttar Pradesh police ne jaalsazi ka muqadma darj kar liya hai. Yeh baat adalati aur police record se samne aayi hai.
Pehla hukm, jis par 14 August ki tareekh thi, Allahabad High Court ki Justice Garima Prashad ke naam se tha. Mehkame ne 2 September ko isi par inhisar karte hue internet service faraham kunandagan ko 95 websites block karne ki hidayat di, jin ke bare mein kaha gaya ke woh Indian Premier League ke jaali match dikha rahi thin aur juwe ke platform chala rahi thin.
High Court ko apne record mein aisa koi muqadma aur us tareekh ko upload hone wala koi hukm nahin mila, aur judge ke private secretary ne tasdeeq ki ke aisa koi hukm jari nahin hua tha. Chief Justice ki hidayat par police ne 6 November ko namaloom afraad ke khilaf dhoka dahi aur jaalsazi, bashmool adalati record ki jaalsazi, ka muqadma darj kiya.
Jaali hukm par adalat ka logo, mohar, aur ek QR code mojood tha, lekin code scan karne par kisi mustanad adalati record ke bajaye ek ghair mutaliqa web page khulta tha. Mehkame ki apni khat-o-kitabat ke mutabiq yeh hukm khud ko wakeel Kartikey Pandey batane wale ek shakhs ne mehkame ko bheja tha.
Rajasthan High Court ke Justice Anoop Kumar Dhand ke naam se banaya gaya doosra hukm 21 July ki ek hidayat ke liye istemal hua, jis ke tehat juwe ki 34 websites block ki gayin. Rajasthan High Court ne kaha ke yeh hukm “jaali maloom hota hai” aur us ke server par mojood nahin.
Maamla kaise samne aaya
Yeh jaalsazi us waqt samne aayi jab ek bainul aqwami khabar rasan idare ke sahafi ne 30 October ko Allahabad High Court ko email kar ke poocha ke mehkame ki website par milne wala ek hukm asli hai ya nahin. Is ke baad adalat ne tahqiqat shuru kin.
Yeh fauri taur par wazeh nahin ke 129 websites ab bhi block hain ya nahin, aur mehkama kisi adalati hukm par amal karne se pehle us ki tasdeeq kaise karta hai.
