Federal Constitutional Court chief justice rebukes Justice Munib Akhtar’s Supreme Court bench over ‘judicial discipline’

Justice Aminuddin Khan said a 2022 bench should not have reopened a settled ruling on the Income Support Levy while review petitions were pending.

Join the conversation
The Supreme Court of Pakistan building in Islamabad behind a green road sign
The Supreme Court of Pakistan building in Islamabad. File photo. — REUTERS
Listen to this articleFederal Constitutional Court chief justice rebukes Justice Munib Akhtar’s Supreme Court bench over ‘judicial discipline’3 min · device voice0:00 / 3:03

— The chief justice of Pakistan’s Federal Constitutional Court has rebuked a Supreme Court bench led by Justice Munib Akhtar, saying its decision to reopen an already-settled case “raises serious concerns regarding judicial discipline, legal norms and institutional propriety”.

The remarks by FCC Chief Justice Aminuddin Khan came in an order dismissing dozens of review petitions against a December 2021 Supreme Court judgment that struck down the Income Support Levy Act 2013, Dawn reported. That judgment, written by then justice Qazi Faez Isa on a bench that included Justice Aminuddin, held that the levy had been passed through the Finance Act 2013 without following the procedure the Constitution requires, so it never became valid law.

‘Without recourse’

Despite that ruling, and while review petitions against it were pending, a three-judge Supreme Court bench including Justice Akhtar granted leave in June 2022 on substantially the same constitutional questions and expressly contemplated reconsidering the earlier decision.

“The course adopted in the subsequent order, authored by Justice Munib Akhtar, raises serious concerns regarding judicial discipline, legal norms and institutional propriety, particularly when the earlier determination remained operative and was already the subject of review proceedings,” Justice Aminuddin wrote.

Later benches must give “due regard” to earlier rulings, he said, and a later grant of leave cannot by itself review, modify or displace an earlier decision. Reconsidering the 2021 judgment “without recourse to the appropriate judicial mechanism” was inconsistent with those principles. “Judicial independence must be exercised consistently with judicial discipline, restraint and institutional decorum,” he wrote.

The two-member FCC bench, which also included Justice Ali Baqar Najafi, found no error in the 2021 judgment and ruled that it “shall remain undisturbed”.

Courts at odds

The Federal Constitutional Court was created through recent constitutional amendments to take over constitutional cases from the Supreme Court, a change critics say has weakened judicial independence. This week, Islamabad High Court Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani resigned, saying the 26th and 27th Amendments had “compromised” the independence of the judiciary.

TT Court Reporter

Courts and the law, from The Thursday Times' court reporter.

More from this desk

The Thursday Times, every morning

The day’s stories that matter, the argument, and what readers read most, in one email before work.

Free. One click to stop, any time.

The conversation

Comments are open on this story. An editor reads every one before it appears.

No one has said anything yet. Be the first.

Published by Thursday Media International thursday.media