US midterms: Justice Department heads to Supreme Court over California ballots a day before the vote

It wants the ballots of people it calls likely noncitizens held back. Two lower courts have refused, and officials say many on its list of 20,000 were never mailed a ballot

Join the conversation
The US Supreme Court building lit up at dusk
The US Supreme Court building in Washington at dusk. File photo. — JOE RAVI/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS (CC BY-SA 3.0)
Part of a running storyUS midterms 2026See all 9 updates

US midterms 2026

Polls open Tuesday
Senate51 for control, 50 for Republicans
34Democrats
31Republicans
House218 for control
0Democrats
0Republicans
The seven Senate toss-ups
Michigan6am
Abdul El-Sayed
Mike Rogers
Texas6am
James Talarico
Ken Paxton
Maine6am
Troy Jackson
Susan Collins
Ohio5:30am
Sherrod Brown
Jon Husted
Iowa7am
Josh Turek
Ashley Hinson
Kansas6am
Adam Hamilton
Roger Marshall
Alaska10am
Mary Peltola
Dan Sullivan

Seats follow race calls by US election desks and are not official results. The Senate count starts from the 65 seats not on the ballot. Democrats include independents who sit with them. Poll-closing times are Pakistan time, Wednesday. Full results and coverage

Listen to this articleUS midterms: Justice Department heads to Supreme Court over California ballots a day before the vote3 min · device voice0:00 / 2:47

— The US Justice Department said on Monday it plans to ask the Supreme Court to step into its fight with California over the state’s voter rolls, a day before the midterm elections, after two lower courts refused to order ballots set aside.

The department says it has identified 20,000 “likely” noncitizens on California’s voter roll and wants their ballots held back until their citizenship can be checked. It is not clear whether the Supreme Court will take up the case, or whether it would act before election day.

The real number of ballots in dispute is likely to be far smaller. County election officials have found that many people on the list did not have active registrations and were not mailed ballots.

A federal district judge rejected the request, and on Friday a divided panel of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals did the same. California and Los Angeles County argued that the federal list is unreliable and that a new system for separating ballots could not be set up while voting is under way.

“There is a material risk that granting the United States its requested relief would result in disenfranchisement and could jeopardize the County’s entire election,” wrote Judges Mark Bennett, a Trump appointee, and Gabriel Sanchez, a Biden appointee. Judge Patrick Bumatay, also appointed by Trump, dissented.

The two judges cited the long-standing rule that election procedures should not be changed on the eve of a vote, as well as the Constitution’s grant of authority to states to run elections. They also pointed to a federal law barring states from systematically removing ineligible voters within 90 days of a federal election.

The dispute has been escalating. In recent weeks, department officials have warned local election officials they could be criminally prosecuted if they do not cooperate, and last week the department sent grand jury subpoenas to employees of the Los Angeles County election office.

California’s polls close at 9am on Wednesday, Pakistan time. Its mail ballots could delay the final House count, with control of Congress at stake.

The conversation

Comments are open on this story. An editor reads every one before it appears.

No one has said anything yet. Be the first.

Published by Thursday Media International thursday.media